Skip to main content

Chargebacks

This guide provides best practices for submitting evidence and managing multiple disputes from the same cardholder.

Updated today

Overview

A chargeback occurs when a credit card provider demands the return of funds for a fraudulent or disputed transaction. This process takes place between the merchant and the card-issuing bank, with a representative from the card brand association acting as the arbitrator.


The Chargeback Process

While terminology varies by card association, the general lifecycle of a dispute follows a consistent path:

  1. Initiation: The cardholder contacts their bank to dispute a payment.

  2. Notification: You receive written notice of the dispute.

  3. Merchant Response: You may either accept the dispute or submit evidence to prove the charge was valid.

  4. The Decision: * If the cardholder wins, the process ends.

    • If the merchant wins, the card-issuing bank can challenge the decision, triggering a second chargeback.

NOTE: Chargebacks are strictly a document review process. There are no live hearings to attend in person or by phone.


Managing Second Chargebacks

If a dispute reaches a second round, the original file remains active. Your second response must include new, stronger evidence; simply resending the initial paperwork will not result in a win.

Before fighting a second chargeback, consider the following:

  • Reason Codes: If the reason is "fraud" and the issuer maintains the charge was unauthorized, it is extremely difficult for a merchant to win.

  • Cost vs. Reward: Escalating a case can result in fees up to $500 if you ultimately lose. Weigh the disputed amount against these potential fees and the standard occurrence fees charged by your provider.


Handling Multiple Disputes

Each transaction is assigned a unique case number and is reviewed individually. If a client disputes multiple payments:

  • No Data Carryover: Do not assume a reviewer will see details from one case in another, even if they involve the same cardholder.

  • Repeat Evidence: You must provide full documentation for every individual case.

  • Cross-Referencing: You should reference related case numbers in your response if they help support your overall argument.

Did this answer your question?